What is the difference between blockchain layers L1 and L2?

Created by Ethos Support, Modified on Fri, 24 May 2024 at 11:31 AM by Ethos Support

Layer 1 (L1) and Layer 2 (L2) are terms used in the context of blockchain scalability solutions, referring to different approaches to address the limitations of blockchain networks in terms of transaction throughput, latency, and scalability. Here are the key differences between Layer 1 and Layer 2 solutions:

Layer 1 (L1): On-chain: Layer 1 solutions involve changes to the underlying blockchain protocol itself. These changes typically aim to improve the scalability and efficiency of the blockchain network directly.

Examples: Sharding, Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus mechanisms, and other protocol upgrades aimed at increasing transaction throughput and reducing latency.

Security: Changes made at Layer 1 directly impact the security of the blockchain network and require careful consideration and testing to ensure the integrity of the system.

Layer 2 (L2): Off-chain: Layer 2 solutions involve building additional protocols or networks that operate on top of the underlying blockchain (hence "off-chain"). These solutions aim to offload some of the transaction processing from the main blockchain, thereby improving scalability and reducing costs.

Examples: Payment channels (e.g., Lightning Network for Bitcoin), sidechains (e.g., Plasma for Ethereum), and state channels.

Scalability: Layer 2 solutions can significantly improve the scalability of blockchain networks by enabling faster and more cost-effective transactions, as most of the transaction processing occurs off-chain.

Interoperability: Layer 2 solutions can be designed to work with multiple blockchain networks, offering interoperability between different platforms.


Decentralization vs. Scalability: Layer 1 solutions often prioritize decentralization and security at the expense of scalability, while Layer 2 solutions prioritize scalability but may introduce trade-offs in terms of decentralization and security.

Complexity: Layer 2 solutions can introduce additional complexity to the ecosystem, as they involve building and maintaining additional infrastructure and protocols. However, they can also offer more flexibility and experimentation in scalability approaches.

Complementarity: Layer 1 and Layer 2 solutions are not mutually exclusive and can be complementary. Many blockchain projects use a combination of Layer 1 and Layer 2 scaling solutions to achieve the desired level of scalability, security, and efficiency.

In summary, Layer 1 solutions focus on improving the underlying blockchain protocol for scalability, while Layer 2 solutions involve building additional protocols or networks on top of the blockchain to offload transaction processing and improve scalability. Both approaches have their advantages and trade-offs and can be used in combination to address the scalability challenges facing blockchain networks.

Was this article helpful?

That’s Great!

Thank you for your feedback

Sorry! We couldn't be helpful

Thank you for your feedback

Let us know how can we improve this article!

Select atleast one of the reasons
CAPTCHA verification is required.

Feedback sent

We appreciate your effort and will try to fix the article